지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제203집
- 발행연도
- 2023.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 37 (37page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2023.12.203.1
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article attempted to speculate on the methods and purpose of Baekje’s acceptance of Confucius’s texts. For reasons of such, the article examines the changes and meaning of Confucius’s text acceptance patterns during the Hanseong Era, and the changes and meaning of Confucius’s knowledge acceptance method due to the fall of Hanseong.
The very origin of the Confucius texts imported from China can be found in the Hanseong Baekje Era. Around AD 3, the acceptance of 〈Chunqiuzuoshichuan〉 was confirmed, and it is considered to have been triggered by the Baekje Royals’ attempts to subsist and thrive. During this era, Baekje accepted Confucius knowledge in textual formats through the Han Commanderies and Chinese immigrants. Through, Baekje came across new knowledge and culture that enabled them to overcome their current status. However, it is inappropriate to view them as figures educated within the official educational system of Chinese thrones. At last, Confucius’s knowledge was accepted to secure the objective for their status of war confronted, the ruling of the public and others during the Hanseong Baekje Era through the Chinese influences.
Due to the fall of Hanseong in 475, the texts accepted from China during the Hanseong Baekje Era were lost, and the circumstances demanded another acceptance of texts from China. In 484, Baekje sent Naebeobjoapyung Sayaksa to Southern Qi to recover from the system demolished by the fall of Hanseong. However, when it failed due to an encounter with the Goguryeo army, Baekje directly requested a doctor to China to bring change to the method of accepting Confucius’s knowledge. This was when a doctor of etiquette lecture and a doctor of Maoshi came to Baekje under the throne of King Seong. Baekje then received the meaning of courtesy and poetry from scholars belonging to the educational institutions of the Chinese Dynasty, which led to the production of political ideology. After the doctors of the Chinese Dynasty returned to his home country, Confucius’s knowledge was continuously passed down by Chinese influences during the earlier period and spread widely to the ruling class and intellectuals. Later, by the early-mid 7th century, the Five Classics, the Hundred Schools of Thought, History were read in Baekje, and in 〈Heukchi Sangji Cemetery Name〉 and 『Japanese Seogi』, 『Chunqiuzuoshichuan』, 『the Analects of Confucius』, 『Han Shu』, 『Shiji』, and 『Hou Han Shu』 were confirmed to have been read.
The very origin of the Confucius texts imported from China can be found in the Hanseong Baekje Era. Around AD 3, the acceptance of 〈Chunqiuzuoshichuan〉 was confirmed, and it is considered to have been triggered by the Baekje Royals’ attempts to subsist and thrive. During this era, Baekje accepted Confucius knowledge in textual formats through the Han Commanderies and Chinese immigrants. Through, Baekje came across new knowledge and culture that enabled them to overcome their current status. However, it is inappropriate to view them as figures educated within the official educational system of Chinese thrones. At last, Confucius’s knowledge was accepted to secure the objective for their status of war confronted, the ruling of the public and others during the Hanseong Baekje Era through the Chinese influences.
Due to the fall of Hanseong in 475, the texts accepted from China during the Hanseong Baekje Era were lost, and the circumstances demanded another acceptance of texts from China. In 484, Baekje sent Naebeobjoapyung Sayaksa to Southern Qi to recover from the system demolished by the fall of Hanseong. However, when it failed due to an encounter with the Goguryeo army, Baekje directly requested a doctor to China to bring change to the method of accepting Confucius’s knowledge. This was when a doctor of etiquette lecture and a doctor of Maoshi came to Baekje under the throne of King Seong. Baekje then received the meaning of courtesy and poetry from scholars belonging to the educational institutions of the Chinese Dynasty, which led to the production of political ideology. After the doctors of the Chinese Dynasty returned to his home country, Confucius’s knowledge was continuously passed down by Chinese influences during the earlier period and spread widely to the ruling class and intellectuals. Later, by the early-mid 7th century, the Five Classics, the Hundred Schools of Thought, History were read in Baekje, and in 〈Heukchi Sangji Cemetery Name〉 and 『Japanese Seogi』, 『Chunqiuzuoshichuan』, 『the Analects of Confucius』, 『Han Shu』, 『Shiji』, and 『Hou Han Shu』 were confirmed to have been read.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 한성백제기 유학 지식의 수용과 목적
Ⅲ. 웅진·사비백제기 유학 지식의 수용
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동아시아의 전적 교류로 본 백제의 유학교육
한국사연구
2020 .03
-
对朴孝银博士论文的评议
한중인문학포럼 발표논문집
2016 .11
-
後漢 左傳學의 자연관과 災異說 : 服虔의 『春秋左氏傳解誼』를 중심으로
중국고중세사연구
2015 .08
-
『春秋左氏傳』에 보이는 鄭子産의 외교정치에 관한 고찰
동양고전연구
2016 .12
-
청광자 이근주의 생애와 의리정신
동서철학연구
2016 .12
-
다니자키 준이치로(谷崎潤一郎)의 공자관(孔子觀)과『기린(麒麟)』
일어일문학연구
2015 .11
-
한국 고대의 유교경전 기록과 목간(木簡)의 서체(書體)
한국사상과 문화
2017 .01
-
『논어』의 예술적 함의와 공자 사상의 연계에 대한 고찰
孔子學
2023 .02
-
『論語』의 문화콘텐츠 스토리텔링(Storytelling) 양상과 가능성
민족문화
2015 .12
-
경학사의 관점에서 본 조선 전기의 《논어》 인식
중국문학
2017 .01
-
西陂 柳僖 春秋學의 독자성과 체계성
한국실학연구
2016 .01
-
공자의 ‘군자’: 최선의 마음 상태를 가진 자 - 『논어』1.1의 재해석을 중심으로 -
동양철학
2019 .01
-
『논어』 첫 구절에 대한 수사학적 접근
수사학
2021 .04
-
『논어(論語)』의 대화 양상 연구 - 『논어』 공부론 모색을 위한 고찰 -
한국사상과 문화
2018 .01
-
西周에서 春秋战国 시기의 병렬구의 변화
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2016 .11
-
신라의 유가 교육과 『논어』
목간과문자
2021 .06
-
志山 金吉洛 博士 學德追念碑
한국양명학회 학술대회 논문집
2018 .04
-
<논어>·<맹자>를 활용한 대학 인문고전 교양교육 사례 연구
동양문화연구
2015 .01
-
『毛詩·周南』의 樂章義와 詩本義
국제언어문학
2023 .12
-
비(非)국가주의적 정치 주체를 위한 권고: 논어1.16의 정치적 재해석
유학연구
2024 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089250853