지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The market is not the only institution that organizes collective activity in our society. Politics operates alongside markets as an additional mechanism of social organization. While market failure is an important aspect of the problem, environmental degradation also stems in part from a kind of political failure. Environmental disputes involve asymmetries of power that consistently skew governmental decisionmaking in favor of less stringent environmental regulation and against the interest of environmental protection. First, a group whose interests are diffuse and have less marginal impact on each individual member will have far more difficulty organizing into an effective pressure group than a smaller group in which each member suffers substantial economic harm. Second, other things being equal, wealthier and more powerful groups tend to have far more political clout than individuals, because of the privileged position they occupy in politics. As a result, environmental disputes almost always involve an asymmetry of power that weighs against environmental protection. Current problems with environmental lawmaking can also be traced to the broader structural problems created by the current legislative processes that allow, or at least fail to discourage, powerful interests from securing legislation and application thereof that would not pass muster on their own merits.
The power imbalance endemic to environmental lawmaking and disputes has the potential to skew governmental decisionmaking in the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. As we perceive the challenges presented by the mismatch between the spatial and temporal reach of modern technology and the tendency of human nature to underestimate the related consequences, we need lawmaking institutions deliberately designed to produce environmental laws capable of overcoming the tendency of human nature to distort disproportionately the consequences of human conduct that are distant rather than immediate. Just as recognized by the Constitution itself in its separation of powers structure, the necessary lawmaking institutions in the area of environmental lawmaking may sometimes require some immunization from the inevitable political pressures created by more short-term and narrow interests, so that environmental lawmaking can deliberately limit the legislature's own perceived accountability for decisions that are unpopular in the short term. Environmental law is, by its nature, difficult to enact because it is so redistributive in its thrust. Because of the nature of ecological cause and effect, which is spread out over time and space, environmental protection laws naturally tend to impose costs currently on some persons for the benefit of other persons in other locations, sometimes far removed in time and space. This can be resulted only when deliberative democracy is working at its best. Only then are lawmakers able to rise above the near-term and more immediate concerns to establish the kind of broader social vision needed to secure and maintain environmental protection law.
The power imbalance endemic to environmental lawmaking and disputes has the potential to skew governmental decisionmaking in the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. As we perceive the challenges presented by the mismatch between the spatial and temporal reach of modern technology and the tendency of human nature to underestimate the related consequences, we need lawmaking institutions deliberately designed to produce environmental laws capable of overcoming the tendency of human nature to distort disproportionately the consequences of human conduct that are distant rather than immediate. Just as recognized by the Constitution itself in its separation of powers structure, the necessary lawmaking institutions in the area of environmental lawmaking may sometimes require some immunization from the inevitable political pressures created by more short-term and narrow interests, so that environmental lawmaking can deliberately limit the legislature's own perceived accountability for decisions that are unpopular in the short term. Environmental law is, by its nature, difficult to enact because it is so redistributive in its thrust. Because of the nature of ecological cause and effect, which is spread out over time and space, environmental protection laws naturally tend to impose costs currently on some persons for the benefit of other persons in other locations, sometimes far removed in time and space. This can be resulted only when deliberative democracy is working at its best. Only then are lawmakers able to rise above the near-term and more immediate concerns to establish the kind of broader social vision needed to secure and maintain environmental protection law.
목차
Ⅰ. 序說
Ⅱ. 환경법의 입법대상의 특성과 환경법 영역에 고유한 입법과정의 개선안: 대의제민주주의 관점에서
Ⅲ. 結語: 환경법 영역에서의 입법과정 개선안이 대의제민주주의 입법과정 전반에서 가지는 함의
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국가입법과 자치입법과의 관계
행정법연구
2008 .12
-
2008년 제ㆍ개정된 환경관련법률의 쟁점과 과제
강원법학
2008 .12
-
환경지표와 지표체계 개발
국토연구
2000 .10
-
한국의 환경문제와 정책과제
국토연구
2004 .09
-
친환경행동의 결정요인과 구조 : 친환경행동의 다차원성과 환경의식의 영향을 중심으로
환경정책
2010 .05
-
지속가능한 발전을 위한 통합환경법 : 프랑스통합환경법과 독일통합환경법안을 중심으로
공법학연구
2012 .02
-
학교 체험 환경교육이 초등학생의 친환경적 행동변화에 미치는 영향
환경교육
2008 .06
-
중학생의 환경에 대한 지식, 신념, 태도가 쟁점 기반의 환경문제 해결력에 미치는 효과
환경교육
2007 .03
-
국민환경의식에 대한 실증적 분석
자원·환경경제연구
2003 .01
-
의원입법의 영향과 책임성
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
제7차 중학교 환경교육과정과 교과서의 환경쟁점 분석
환경교육
2004 .12
-
법학전문대학원 체제에서의 환경법 교육방법론 소고
강원법학
2008 .06
-
환경교육 프로그램 유형에 따른 초등학생의 환경소양 변화
환경교육
2012 .12
-
환경정책 관련요인이 기업의 입지선택 및 운영과정에 미치는 영향 분석 : 김포시 제조업체를 사례로
한국사회와 행정연구
2003 .08
-
ICT를 활용한 환경교육용 소프트웨어 개발 방안과 사례
환경교육
2004 .07
-
중등학교 환경 교과의 방향에 대한 제언 : 오염과 공해 그리고 환경 문제
환경교육
2006 .08
-
환경복지 개념 도입에 관한 시론적 연구
환경정책
2013 .09
-
우리나라 환경법의 문제점과 과제
법학논총
2011 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
영국의 토양오염법제와 그 시사점
김성배
환경법과 정책
2013
.05
立法過程에 대한 憲法的 統制 : 憲裁決 1997. 7.16, 96헌라2
明載眞
헌법판례연구
1999
.07
미국 위헌법률심사기준의 정립 과정에서 우월적 지위 이론(Preferred Position Doctrine)의 의의 : 표현의 자유 법리를 중심으로
이우영
공법학연구
2011
.11
투명성의 관점에서 본 대의제의 한계와 극복방안 : 미국과 프랑스의 예를 중심으로
백수원
미국헌법연구
2011
.12
환경문제의 구조화와 한국환경법 : 시론(試論)
유진식
법학연구
2015
.01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0