지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.12
- 수록면
- 19 - 596 (580page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study analyzes main issues of crime and criminal justice policy in Korea by using the Law and Economics approach.
In chapter 2, this study shows macroscopic view on crime and criminal justice policy, starting with discussing the basic concept of Law and Economics study. In particular, it emphasize the differences between civil liability for controlling gain and loss and criminal liability for inducing social norm-observance through legal sanction to assailant. Then it address the requisites for crime such as negligence, accident and attempt. Regarding punishment theory, it compares private law-execution with public law-execution and examines alternatives between monetary penalty and discretionary penalty.
Comparing the sickness hypothesis and the rationality hypothesis, chapter 3 proposes to have complementary point of view rather than sentiment of opposition between the two hypotheses. Defining the purpose of criminal justice policy as ‘minimizing the social cost for crime’ in terms of economic viewpoint, this chapter tries to find out the meaning of precedent studies on presenting optimum deterrent level of crime. Especially as a case study, this chapter shows the validity of policy direction of drug market, drug criminals and other related issues - blocking drug supply line and restraining drug demand
Researching the Behavioral Law and Economics study, chapter 4 more focuses upon producing ‘counter examples’ about individual judgment and patterns of behavior, rather than forming a consistent criminal act in traditional theory. To make new criminal policy alternatives more persuasive, this chapter suggests to build more consistent and generalized explanation structure in constructing the Law and Economics theory.
Starting with examining the various concepts of cost, chapter 5 addresses the estimation skills of social cost of crime - especially crime-victim survey, criminal justice agency budget analysis, value-of-property-changing based estimation, ruling-based estimation, contingent valuation method, fear and shadow pricing method, total cost of crime estimation and theoretical marginal WTP. It then shows the implications of crime cost estimation in terms of general punishment theory, crime prevention policy and sentencing policy. Reviewing the past research in Korea, this study finds out the considerable limitation and distortion in estimation process of crime cost. Next year the further study - especially empirical estimation of crime cost in Korea - will be conducted.
Chapter 6 analyzes crime seriousness by using the survey targeting 1327 citizens of Seoul for 111 crime types. According to the results of survey, general public feels ascendant assaulting and child sex offending is the most serious crime above all things. Women’s fear of crime is significantly higher than men. Different age groups have different level of seriousness for each crime. However, its difference according to the income and education was not significant. Scale of the damage and morality are considered as the most important factors to determine the seriousness of the crime. Comparing existing sentencing policy and seriousness of crime in Korea will be tackled next year.
Under the existing Korean national budgeting system, Korean prosecutor service and police department fail to establish any kinds of links between their outcomes and budget scale, although their budget scale has been kept substantially increasing. Korean prosecutor service and police department need more exact programmatic budget system such as U.K or other developed countries.
Using CVM method, the effects of 'sex offender notification policy' and 'electronic bracelet policy' is estimated in chapter 8. It is found that the annual total benefits for the notification policy is 659.5 billion won and 798.6 billion won for the electronic bracelet policy. These results could play an important role to legitimate these two policies strongly.
In chapter 2, this study shows macroscopic view on crime and criminal justice policy, starting with discussing the basic concept of Law and Economics study. In particular, it emphasize the differences between civil liability for controlling gain and loss and criminal liability for inducing social norm-observance through legal sanction to assailant. Then it address the requisites for crime such as negligence, accident and attempt. Regarding punishment theory, it compares private law-execution with public law-execution and examines alternatives between monetary penalty and discretionary penalty.
Comparing the sickness hypothesis and the rationality hypothesis, chapter 3 proposes to have complementary point of view rather than sentiment of opposition between the two hypotheses. Defining the purpose of criminal justice policy as ‘minimizing the social cost for crime’ in terms of economic viewpoint, this chapter tries to find out the meaning of precedent studies on presenting optimum deterrent level of crime. Especially as a case study, this chapter shows the validity of policy direction of drug market, drug criminals and other related issues - blocking drug supply line and restraining drug demand
Researching the Behavioral Law and Economics study, chapter 4 more focuses upon producing ‘counter examples’ about individual judgment and patterns of behavior, rather than forming a consistent criminal act in traditional theory. To make new criminal policy alternatives more persuasive, this chapter suggests to build more consistent and generalized explanation structure in constructing the Law and Economics theory.
Starting with examining the various concepts of cost, chapter 5 addresses the estimation skills of social cost of crime - especially crime-victim survey, criminal justice agency budget analysis, value-of-property-changing based estimation, ruling-based estimation, contingent valuation method, fear and shadow pricing method, total cost of crime estimation and theoretical marginal WTP. It then shows the implications of crime cost estimation in terms of general punishment theory, crime prevention policy and sentencing policy. Reviewing the past research in Korea, this study finds out the considerable limitation and distortion in estimation process of crime cost. Next year the further study - especially empirical estimation of crime cost in Korea - will be conducted.
Chapter 6 analyzes crime seriousness by using the survey targeting 1327 citizens of Seoul for 111 crime types. According to the results of survey, general public feels ascendant assaulting and child sex offending is the most serious crime above all things. Women’s fear of crime is significantly higher than men. Different age groups have different level of seriousness for each crime. However, its difference according to the income and education was not significant. Scale of the damage and morality are considered as the most important factors to determine the seriousness of the crime. Comparing existing sentencing policy and seriousness of crime in Korea will be tackled next year.
Under the existing Korean national budgeting system, Korean prosecutor service and police department fail to establish any kinds of links between their outcomes and budget scale, although their budget scale has been kept substantially increasing. Korean prosecutor service and police department need more exact programmatic budget system such as U.K or other developed countries.
Using CVM method, the effects of 'sex offender notification policy' and 'electronic bracelet policy' is estimated in chapter 8. It is found that the annual total benefits for the notification policy is 659.5 billion won and 798.6 billion won for the electronic bracelet policy. These results could play an important role to legitimate these two policies strongly.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 범죄와 형사정책에 관한 법경제학 일반론
제3장 범죄 및 형벌의 경제적 분석과 사례연구
제4장 범죄 및 형사정책에 대한 행태법경제학적 접근
제5장 범죄비용의 추계
제6장 범죄의 심각성에 대한 인식조사
제7장 국내외 형사사법기관의 예산지출 실태와 법경제학적 함의
제8장 형사정책분야에 있어 비용-편익분석 기법의 의의와 적용
제9장 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
부록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
마약 및 조직범죄의 형사정책적 현안과 종합적 대응방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
지역특성을 고려한 범죄위험지역 도출에 대한 연구 : 대전광역시를 사례로
주택도시연구
2019 .04
-
‘처벌받지 않는 범죄’에 대한 개념적 접근 : “비유효 범죄” 영역의 개념 연구
형사정책연구
2005 .09
-
범죄유형별 심각성 가중치를 이용한 범죄발생의 질적 분포와 추세
형사정책연구
2001 .12
-
형법각칙 개정연구 [2] : 개인적 법익에 관한 죄 (1)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007 .12
-
犯罪의 本質에 대한 刑事司法的 考察
법학연구
2005 .11
-
형법각칙의 합동범 개념 폐지에 관한 시론
홍익법학
2018 .01
-
한국의 범죄발생추세에 대한 분석 : 1964-2000
형사정책연구
2003 .03
-
공무원범죄에 대한 규범적 통제 - 공무원범죄의 개념과 통제방안을 중심으로 -
비교형사법연구
2011 .01
-
고령화 사회의 노인범죄의 추이와 영향요인 연구
지방정부연구
2008 .08
-
한국 고령범죄의 추이에 관한 연구
경찰학논총
2019 .01
-
서울의 범죄위험지역 분석 및 안전증진방안 연구
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2013 .10
-
金融市场化背景下行政犯理论的再审视
원광법학
2017 .01
-
사이버범죄 관련 법령정비 방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .02
-
도시범죄의 발생현황 및 예방대책에 관한 소고 : 청주시의 5대 범죄를 중심으로
한양법학
2018 .02
-
우리나라 범죄의 사회적 비용 추정에 관한 연구 : 범죄의 심각성 점수를 고려한 결과를 중심으로
한국사회정책
2010 .08
-
한국의 범죄특성에 관한 연구 - 지난 10년간 5대 범죄발생 분석을 중심으로 -
경찰학논총
2011 .01
-
형법상 미수범 감경규정의 특가법 적용문제
한양법학
2013 .08
-
결과발생시의 행위와 결과사이의 미수범 평가(評價) : 日本에서의 논의를 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2012 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
범죄 및 형사정책에 대한 법경제학적 접근(Ⅲ) : 비용편익분석을 중심으로
박경래
,
김용호
,
최성락
외 3명
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2011
.12
범죄 및 형사정책에 대한 행태법경제학적 접근
고학수
저스티스
2010
.04
법경제학에서 바라 본 형사법에 관한 고찰
박광현
법학연구
2012
.11
범죄 및 형사정책에 대한 법경제학적 접근 (Ⅱ) : 형법상주요 이념, 요건 및 원리에 대한 경제학적 분석
김대근
,
이종인
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2010
.12
형사특별법 정비방안(3) 특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률
전지연
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003948401