지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The foregoing analysis can usefully inform competition policy with regard to alliances in a number of ways. First, empirical analysis raises questions as to whether immunized alliances are continuing to deliver unequivocal benefits to consumers. A period of beneficial market performance, followed by a spate of lower or even negative benefits resulting from policy initiatives, is not unusual for restructuring industries. For example, much of the consolidation that occurred at the outset of electricity restructuring in the United Sates likely reflected a market-driven decrease in the number of firms which had previously been determined by regulatory fiat. Subsequent consolidation, however, tended to raise more concrete market power problems. A similar effect is likely in play for airline alliances as they continue to expand. Policymakers should be sensitive to this pattern in evaluating requests for codesharing and immunity, giving fair weight to empirical work that assesses both the costs and benefits of immunization.
A second implication of the foregoing analysis is that policymakers must wrestle with a number of complex factors that affect the “net” calculation of alliance-related benefits. Based on the foregoing assessment, there are five major factors that are important to consider in evaluating the expansion of immunized alliances. The first factor is the cost saving associated with coordinated operations of alliance members and the attendant fare reductions that might naturally arise as alliance members more fully internalize the complementary nature of their service offerings in handling connecting passengers. The second is the improved service quality that results from more integrated scheduling, a perceived increase in flight frequency, and potentially improved configuration of on-the-ground operations to provide smoother service to interlining passengers.
A third factor is the cost(in terms of higher fares and reduced quality or choice) of anticompetitive effects related to alliance expansion, such as the diminution of competition on overlapping routes and the potential foreclosing of rival access to alliance members’ networks. A fourth is any cost associated with alliance members’ incentives to retard the development of competing alliances. These costs are separate and apart from higher prorate charges or access impediments that alliance members may place on rival carriers.
Finally, there is the potential cost of mutual forbearance in the form of implicit coordination between immunized alliances to refrain from entering further into each other’s city-pair markets or aggressively expanding output in existing overlap markets. This is of particular concern in light of a trend toward expansion of alliances and alliance consolidation.
A second implication of the foregoing analysis is that policymakers must wrestle with a number of complex factors that affect the “net” calculation of alliance-related benefits. Based on the foregoing assessment, there are five major factors that are important to consider in evaluating the expansion of immunized alliances. The first factor is the cost saving associated with coordinated operations of alliance members and the attendant fare reductions that might naturally arise as alliance members more fully internalize the complementary nature of their service offerings in handling connecting passengers. The second is the improved service quality that results from more integrated scheduling, a perceived increase in flight frequency, and potentially improved configuration of on-the-ground operations to provide smoother service to interlining passengers.
A third factor is the cost(in terms of higher fares and reduced quality or choice) of anticompetitive effects related to alliance expansion, such as the diminution of competition on overlapping routes and the potential foreclosing of rival access to alliance members’ networks. A fourth is any cost associated with alliance members’ incentives to retard the development of competing alliances. These costs are separate and apart from higher prorate charges or access impediments that alliance members may place on rival carriers.
Finally, there is the potential cost of mutual forbearance in the form of implicit coordination between immunized alliances to refrain from entering further into each other’s city-pair markets or aggressively expanding output in existing overlap markets. This is of particular concern in light of a trend toward expansion of alliances and alliance consolidation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 항공사 얼라이언스와 시스템(Systems)경쟁
Ⅲ. 얼라이언스와 경쟁법상의 문제
Ⅳ. 얼라이언스의 경쟁효과와 소비자 혜택에 관한 분석
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전략적 제휴의 연구동향 : 국내외 주요 학술지를 중심으로
인터넷전자상거래연구
2015 .06
-
도․소매 여행업체 간의 제휴 관리역량과 관계지속성에 대한 관계 연구 : 제휴 성과의 매개효과를 중심으로
관광레저연구
2013 .09
-
항공사 전략적 제휴가 항공사에 미치는 효과에 대한 연구
호텔관광연구
2000 .03
-
한미동맹의 위기와 동맹관리역량의 평가
국제관계연구
2004 .03
-
중국 진출 다국적 물류 기업의 서비스 제휴 동기와 파트너 선정, 제휴성과, 시장성과의 관계
서비스경영학회지
2012 .12
-
중국 진출 다국적 물류 기업의 서비스 제휴 동기와 파트너 선정 기준, 제휴성과, 시장성과의 관계
한국서비스경영학회 학술대회
2012 .11
-
항공사 전략적 제휴의 성과와 성공요인에 관한 연구
여행학연구
2004 .10
-
Japan between Alliance and Community
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .08
-
인터넷을 통한 전자상거래기업의 경영전략과 전략적 제휴에 관한 연구
문화산업연구
2007 .06
-
The Future of US Alliances in Asia
Global Asia
2010 .12
-
Long-term alliance in the airline industry
한국유통학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2012 .02
-
한국기업의 국제전략제휴 성과 결정요인
무역학회지
2002 .09
-
환경적합성 및 제휴역량이 제휴성과에 미치는 영향 : 제휴역량의 매개역할을 중심으로
관광레저연구
2007 .02
-
전략적 제휴의 성과측도와 성과결정요인에 관한 메타분석연구
사회과학연구
2014 .12
-
Alliance Portfolio and Knowledge Acquisition : Focusing on cost and benefit sides of knowledge acquisition in R&D alliance portfolio
한국경영학회 융합학술대회
2014 .08
-
통상 마찰에 대응하기 위한 한국 반도체산업의 제휴형태와 기업특성의 관계에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2008 .09
-
Alliance Portfolio and Knowledge Acquisition : Focusing on cost and benefit sides of knowledge acquisition in R&D alliance portfolio
한국전략경영학회 학술대회발표논문집
2014 .08
-
Information Sharing Alliances in the Airline Industry: an Examination of Code Sharing Agreements
Asian International Studies Review
2005 .01
-
새로운 국제질서와 한미동맹
국제관계연구
2003 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000705882