지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.10
- 수록면
- 217 - 255 (39page)
- DOI
- 10.31280/CC.2010.10.4.2.217
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On the basis of the early schism theory the religionsgeschichtliche Schule has suggested that Gentile Christianity started from Antioch apart from Jewish Christianity. They considered that Antioch was a very significant region related to the beginning of the earliest Christianity because Jesus tradition was translated at Antioch where was bilingual. However, Martin Hengel has held that the translation of Jesus tradition did not start from Antioch but from the Earliest Christian church in Jerusalem. In relation to this, he thinks that ?βρα?οι refer to Aramaic-speaking Palestinian Jewish Christians whereas ?λληνιστα? and ?πτ?, were Hellenistic Jewish Christians who spoke only Greek. He makes a monolingual, geographical, and ethnic distinction between ?βρα?οι and ?λληνιστα?.
However, the Graeco-Roman Near East including Judaeo-Palestine was bilingual. This is approved by inscriptions, papyrus, and population geographical evidence. This means that translation of the Jesus tradition started from Galilee during Jesus’ ministry, not from Antioch or Jerusalem church. Furthermore, the two terms, ?βρα?οι and ?λληνιστα?, are not monolingual but bilingual designations. That is, ?βρα?οι spoke Aramaic as their matrix language and other language as their embedded language and ?λληνιστα?, spoke Greek as their matrix language and other language as their embedded language. Also, it seems that ?πτ?, were bilinguals. If Jerusalem Christian community was bilingual, the church members tried to choose bilinguals as their community leaders. As a result, Luke describes ?πτ?, as leaders of the whole Jerusalem community. He parallels ?πτ?, with δ?δ?κα. Luke also insinuates that Jesus" promise given to δ?δ?κα is fulfilled by the ?πτ?, and commandment given to δ?δ?κα was performed by the ?πτ?. This indicates that Luke stresses the line-up of Jesus - δ?δ?κα - ?πτ?. Hence, there was not early schism between ?βρα?οι and ?λληνιστα?, and between δ?δ?κα and ?πτ?.
Accordingly, the bilingualism of Graeco-Roman Near East supports that Jesus tradition was translated during Jesus’ ministry but undermines the early schism theory. Furthermore, it is hard to find a sharp distinction between Jesus and Paul, Petrine Christianity and Pauline Christianity, Aramaic-speaking Palestinian Christianity and Greek-speaking Hellenistic Christianity, and Jewish Christianity and Gentile Christianity from the perspective of monolingualism because bilingual Jesus tradition was delivered to Paul through the Twelve and the Seven.
However, the Graeco-Roman Near East including Judaeo-Palestine was bilingual. This is approved by inscriptions, papyrus, and population geographical evidence. This means that translation of the Jesus tradition started from Galilee during Jesus’ ministry, not from Antioch or Jerusalem church. Furthermore, the two terms, ?βρα?οι and ?λληνιστα?, are not monolingual but bilingual designations. That is, ?βρα?οι spoke Aramaic as their matrix language and other language as their embedded language and ?λληνιστα?, spoke Greek as their matrix language and other language as their embedded language. Also, it seems that ?πτ?, were bilinguals. If Jerusalem Christian community was bilingual, the church members tried to choose bilinguals as their community leaders. As a result, Luke describes ?πτ?, as leaders of the whole Jerusalem community. He parallels ?πτ?, with δ?δ?κα. Luke also insinuates that Jesus" promise given to δ?δ?κα is fulfilled by the ?πτ?, and commandment given to δ?δ?κα was performed by the ?πτ?. This indicates that Luke stresses the line-up of Jesus - δ?δ?κα - ?πτ?. Hence, there was not early schism between ?βρα?οι and ?λληνιστα?, and between δ?δ?κα and ?πτ?.
Accordingly, the bilingualism of Graeco-Roman Near East supports that Jesus tradition was translated during Jesus’ ministry but undermines the early schism theory. Furthermore, it is hard to find a sharp distinction between Jesus and Paul, Petrine Christianity and Pauline Christianity, Aramaic-speaking Palestinian Christianity and Greek-speaking Hellenistic Christianity, and Jewish Christianity and Gentile Christianity from the perspective of monolingualism because bilingual Jesus tradition was delivered to Paul through the Twelve and the Seven.
목차
1. ‘헤브라이오이’(?βρα?οι)와 ‘헬레니스타이’(?λληνιστα?)에 대한 전통적 해석과 초기 분파 이론 개괄
2. 마르틴 헹엘의 ‘헤브라이오이’와 ‘헬레니스타이’ 해석과 초기 분파 이론
3. 이중 언어 사용자인 ‘헤브라이오이’와 ‘헬레니스타이’
4. 이중 언어 사용자인 ‘헵타’
5. 결론
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
예수와 이방인의 구원
대구사학
2013 .01
-
예수 전승과 복음서 전승의 이중 언어적 전달 : 1세기 팔레스타인과 안디옥의 경우
신약논단
2010 .06
-
예수는 율법을 폐지하려고 했는가?
역사와 담론
2012 .01
-
JESUS AND WOMEN AND THE CHURCH TODAY
신학과세계
1995 .06
-
유대인 예수 탐구－기독교 신학에 대한 새로운 도전
신학과 선교
2014 .01
-
안디옥과 예수말씀의 전승
장신논단
2003 .06
-
바울 서신에 나타난 예수의 수난 전승 : 그 신학적 해석 모델을 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2001 .09
-
Korea and Christianity
신학지남
1968 .03
-
누가의 ‘예수의 죽음’ 이해(눅 23:44-49)
성경원문연구
2011 .10
-
Three Ways of Interpreting Jesus
Journal of Christian Education & Information Technology
2004 .04
-
예수와 기독교의 독특성에 대한 일고찰
신학과세계
2000 .06
-
누가복음에 나타난 예수의 여성에 대한 관점 연구
대학과 복음
2008 .12
-
초기 기독교의 계층 구성과 그 의미
역사학보
2005 .12
-
김춘수의 시적 정서와 기독교적 심상
세계문학비교연구
2007 .01
-
교사로서의 역사적 예수 연구: 유대적 관점에서
기독교교육 논총
2015 .01
-
신약성서에 나타난 여러 형태의 신앙관에 대한 연구
신학과 목회
2008 .05
-
예수와 초기그리스도교의 다양성
Canon&Culture
2017 .04
-
한국 현대시에 투영된 예수의 초상 : 성서신학적 테마의 변용과 그 유형을 중심으로
한국기독교신학논총
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
유대 신앙과 헬라 문화, 그 만남과 갈등 : 희생 제물의 경우
왕대일
Canon&Culture
2009
.04
바울과 예루살렘교회와의 관계 : 예루살렘 교회를 위한 모금을 중심으로
조광호
헤르메네이아 투데이
2002
.09
바울과 율법 : 로마서와 갈라디아서에 공통적으로 나타난 바울의 율법 이해
이진섭
Canon&Culture
2011
.10
아레오바고에 선 사도 바울
김학철
Canon&Culture
2009
.04
'직설법과 명령법'을 넘어 바울 윤리를 새롭게 보기 : 갈라디아서를 중심으로
선우 천
Canon&Culture
2012
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-001486174