메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김용운 (지방공기업평가원)
저널정보
동아대학교 법학연구소 동아법학 東亞法學 第68號
발행연도
2015.8
수록면
25 - 47 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There have been nationwide interests in the management of public institions in Korea because their number and variety are greater than those in other OECD member nations. Such interests have been changed into a key national agenda to innovate public institutions these days as their weak performances, lax management and loose work ethicks were revealed publicly. Specifically, Korean government has focused on both finding out and eliminating their irresponsible practices and forcing them to innovate themselves by using the powerful tools the government hold, for example, the mandatory performance evaluation and incentive system. Though the national drive is a step in the right direction, this study questions if the government may overlook the importance of diagnosing the status quo of overaching laws on public institutions. Given that the governmental management of public institutions is always based on the laws, it would be helpful to review the basic law system to manage the public institutions in searching for the fundamental remedy for their alleged illness.
Based on two theories, principal-agent theory and new public management theory, this study tries to understand the law system on the public institutions management comprehensively and analyze the appropriateness of the goal and contents of governmental management of the institutions on the relevant laws. This study argues that while it is necessary for the government to intervene in the operation of public institutions to secure the fulfillness of public interests, the intervention should not restrict the minimum autonomy required to acquire the efficiency expected as independent public entities. It also suggests that for the balanced fulfillment of both public responsibility and efficiency, the differentiated management strategies for each type of the instititutions are desirable, holding the overarching management principles as they are in the laws. The rational typology of public institutions is necessary before exploring the strategies, of course.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 공공기관 관리에 관한 이론적 논의
Ⅲ. 관련법상 공공기관 관리의 방향 및 주요 내용
Ⅳ. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌
〈국문요약〉
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-001852162