지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.12
- 수록면
- 607 - 616 (10page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines a model for ‘who supports direct democracy.’ Basically, supporting direct democracy arise when disappointment with representative democracy arise. There are various types of direct democracy and referendum is the most institutionalized one since it is based on voting process. Hence, referendum has an intersecting point with representative democracy and is even substituting it in some European countries. Thus, it is reasonable to argue that referendum is the most accessible and popular form of democracy. We starts from the assumption that those who are highly disappointed with representative democracy would support referendum.
Existing researches have made two models for who supports direct democracy including referendum. The one is ‘political disaffection model’ and the other is ‘cognitive mobilization model.’ Political disaffection model means those who are disappointed with and excluded from representative democracy would support referendum. and corresponds with our assumption. On the other hand, cognitive mobilization model means those who have greater political resources would support referendum.
We found there are some mistakes in existing researches. (1) They have not classified disaffection with parties (i.e. actors in representative democracy) from that with institution(i.e. representative democratic institution such as electoral system). (2) They have ignored both separate models can be integrated into a single model. (3) Researches are based on European countries only. Our research is distinguished with existing researches in that our hypothesis is those who have high political resources but are disappointed with political parties would support referendum. We test the hypothesis on Korea as a proxy of non-European country.
We used Korean General Social Survey(KGSS) data in 2004 since the it has almost all items suitable for purpose of our study. And we applied multi-variate regression model to show the relationship between our integrated model and supporting referendum. Thus, we found that political disaffection model and cognitive mobilization model can be integrated well. Also, the model is appropriate even out of European countries.
Existing researches have made two models for who supports direct democracy including referendum. The one is ‘political disaffection model’ and the other is ‘cognitive mobilization model.’ Political disaffection model means those who are disappointed with and excluded from representative democracy would support referendum. and corresponds with our assumption. On the other hand, cognitive mobilization model means those who have greater political resources would support referendum.
We found there are some mistakes in existing researches. (1) They have not classified disaffection with parties (i.e. actors in representative democracy) from that with institution(i.e. representative democratic institution such as electoral system). (2) They have ignored both separate models can be integrated into a single model. (3) Researches are based on European countries only. Our research is distinguished with existing researches in that our hypothesis is those who have high political resources but are disappointed with political parties would support referendum. We test the hypothesis on Korea as a proxy of non-European country.
We used Korean General Social Survey(KGSS) data in 2004 since the it has almost all items suitable for purpose of our study. And we applied multi-variate regression model to show the relationship between our integrated model and supporting referendum. Thus, we found that political disaffection model and cognitive mobilization model can be integrated well. Also, the model is appropriate even out of European countries.
목차
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
COGNITIVE MOBILIZATION AND POLITICAL DISAFFECTION
THEORETICAL MODIFICATION AND SYNTHESIS
RESEARCH DESIGN AND MEASUREMENT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
REFERENCE
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
레퍼렌덤에 관한 엘리트의 정치적 동기와 정당정치: 서울시 무상급식 주민투표 사례를 중심으로
한국정당학회보
2021 .03
-
The Aftermath of the Brexit Referendum: Political and Economic Impact in the UK
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2016 .10
-
민주적 대의제의 실현
법학연구
2018 .01
-
시민의 입법참여와 헌법 - 국민발안제 도입논의를 중심으로
외법논집
2018 .01
-
The Brexit Referendum and Its Implications for Korea’s Foreign Policy
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .05
-
주민투표의 숙의적 참여수준과원자력 갈등관리 효력에 관한 분석
한국비교정부학보
2016 .01
-
헌법 제72조 국민투표에 관한 연구 ― ｢형사소송법｣, ｢검찰청법｣ 개정을 계기로 ―
공법연구
2022 .06
-
직접민주주의의 국제 현황과 이론적 쟁점에 관한 연구: 국민투표ㆍ국민발안ㆍ국민소환을 중심으로
시민사회와 NGO
2018 .01
-
우루과이 직접민주주의 제도의작동과 정치적 효과
세계지역연구논총
2018 .01
-
주민투표제도에 관한 헌법적 검토
공법학연구
2019 .08
-
민주주의 위기의 원인과 대안에 대한 이론적 고찰: 국민투표, 사법심사권, 그리고 정당해산제도를 중심으로
현대정치연구
2020 .04
-
Why Are South Korean Citizens Dissatisfied with Democracy?
비교민주주의연구
2019 .01
-
현대 대의민주주의 제도 연구-직접민주주의 요소인 국민투표제도의 재인식을 중심으로-
홍익법학
2019 .01
-
영국의 유럽공동체(EC)-유럽연합(EU) 회원국 지위에 관한 재협상과 국민투표: 1975년과 2016년 사례에 대한 비교연구
EU연구
2021 .01
-
A comparative analysis of the difference in attitudes of Britain and Spain towards independence referendum
유럽연구
2021 .05
-
중심에 대한 주변의 항의로서의 민간주도형 주민투표 : 삼척·영덕·기장의 원전관련 주민투표를 중심으로
환경사회학연구 ECO
2017 .12
-
스코틀랜드 민족당 (SNP)의 독립 요구 분석 : 긴축재정과 중앙정부의 전략적 합의를 중심으로
유럽연구
2016 .06
-
Discussions on the Direct Democracy’s Strengths and Weaknesses in legalistic aspects in the U.S.
헌법판례연구
2016 .12
-
국가정책 주민투표제도에 관한 헌법정책론 : 참여․숙의민주주의 이론을 중심으로
공법학연구
2017 .08
-
The Current State of South Korea’s Democracy
JIAS
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-331-002309952