지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The relationship between king of Goryeo and recipients of Mongolian public posts changed depending on the Goryeo-Mongol relationship. In the early stage, the Mongol emperor officially appointed recipients of Mongolian public office, but the king of Goryeo could practice bogeogwon (保擧權), thereby bridging the relationship between the recipient of the post with influential politicians of Mongol. In this case, bogeogwon was acknowledged as public authority, meaning that the Goryeo king"s power could wield influence in appointing Goryeo government officials.
Kings of Goryeo allowed his officials to receive public posts from Mongol, and kept them close. However, as the recipients of such posts honed their political prowess and began to pass on their positions to their offsprings, this relationship changed. Moreover, as king"s power weakened and those close to the Yuan Dynasty gained more power, the latter frequently engaged in political actions that repressed king"s authority.
The hereditary succession of Mongolian public posts led to the weakening of king"s influence in personnel affairs, and diluted his control over government officials. Eventually, Goryeo kings came to be seen as jikshin (直臣), not unlike recipients of Mongolian public posts. Officials who received Mongolian public posts became direct servants of Mongol emperor, no longer baeshin (陪臣) with the king of Goryeo as a connecting link.
With the widespread succession of Mongolian public posts, Goryeo government officials had to serve both Mongol emperor and Goryeo king "as a servant." As recipients of Mongolian public posts expanded political influence, Goryeo king"s authority declined and political power was dispersed. The subsequent weakening of king"s ruling power became an urgent issue to address. To do so, King Gongmin tried to discard Mongolian public posts like manho, which the position holders could pass on to their offsprings backed by Mongolian government and politicians, and change such positions in a way that is directly granted by the king of Goryeo. Over the long span of the Goryeo-Mongol relationship, the hereditary succession of Mongolian public posts worked as a factor that affected the dynamics between the king of Goryeo and his servants.
Kings of Goryeo allowed his officials to receive public posts from Mongol, and kept them close. However, as the recipients of such posts honed their political prowess and began to pass on their positions to their offsprings, this relationship changed. Moreover, as king"s power weakened and those close to the Yuan Dynasty gained more power, the latter frequently engaged in political actions that repressed king"s authority.
The hereditary succession of Mongolian public posts led to the weakening of king"s influence in personnel affairs, and diluted his control over government officials. Eventually, Goryeo kings came to be seen as jikshin (直臣), not unlike recipients of Mongolian public posts. Officials who received Mongolian public posts became direct servants of Mongol emperor, no longer baeshin (陪臣) with the king of Goryeo as a connecting link.
With the widespread succession of Mongolian public posts, Goryeo government officials had to serve both Mongol emperor and Goryeo king "as a servant." As recipients of Mongolian public posts expanded political influence, Goryeo king"s authority declined and political power was dispersed. The subsequent weakening of king"s ruling power became an urgent issue to address. To do so, King Gongmin tried to discard Mongolian public posts like manho, which the position holders could pass on to their offsprings backed by Mongolian government and politicians, and change such positions in a way that is directly granted by the king of Goryeo. Over the long span of the Goryeo-Mongol relationship, the hereditary succession of Mongolian public posts worked as a factor that affected the dynamics between the king of Goryeo and his servants.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 몽골관직의 수여 계기와 방식
Ⅲ. 승습 사례와 특징
Ⅳ. 승습의 확장과 군신관계의 변형
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미치쓰나노하하의 이계(異界)체험과 문학적 달성
일본어문학
2016 .01
-
고려 국왕 즉위에 관한 외교 형식의 변화와 의미
역사문화연구
2023 .05
-
북한의 율곡 연구- 반동적 관념론자에서 선진적 사상가로
율곡학연구
2017 .12
-
Personal Trajectories and National History: Why the Goryeo People Went to the Mongol Empire and How They Lived There
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2024 .12
-
역사·한국사 교과서 ‘고려‐ 몽골 관계’ 서사 재구성 제안
역사교육
2021 .12
-
고려-몽골(원) 관계사 연구를 위한 노력과 종합적 시각의 모색
역사학보
2025 .03
-
郭嵩燾의 出使 여정과 ≪使西紀程≫의 成書 과정
중국문학
2020 .01
-
고려가 몽골제국에 바라는 것 - 김구(金坵)의 외교문서에 표현된 원종 대 양국관계의 재구성 -
한국사연구
2022 .12
-
13∼14세기 요동 고려인 세력과 고려 왕실의 충돌
한국사연구
2018 .06
-
Singing Mongolian: Language Preservation, Cultural Representation, and Resistance
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2019 .12
-
고려에 下嫁해 온 몽골공주들의 정치적 위치와 고려-몽골 관계: 齊國大長公主의 사례를 중심으로
이화사학연구
2017 .01
-
고려 원종대 이장용의 대몽 외교활동
한국인물사연구
2016 .03
-
고려국왕의 征東行省 保擧權 장악과 그 의미
史叢(사총)
2017 .01
-
충숙왕대의 征東省官
역사교육
2017 .03
-
몽골황제권의 작용과 고려국왕의 사법적 위상 변화
동국사학
2016 .01
-
天津方言的特征及使用??考察
중국학
2020 .01
-
고구려인가 기자조선인가: 몽골제국에서 고려 역사상의 경합
역사와현실
2022 .09
-
司法문제를 통해서 본 몽골 복속기 고려국왕 위상 : 다루가치 · 管軍官 체재기의 ‘雜問’을 중심으로
사학연구
2016 .03
-
몽골 -고려 군사동맹 관계 : 양국관계를 조망하는 하나의 관점
역사와 담론
2018 .10
-
문어몽골어의 소위 전통전사에 대하여
언어학
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-001702468