지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the second half of the 13th century, Goryeo was literally pillaged by the Mongol Yuan empire, but when the imperial government’s extraction of Goryeo resources began to drop, the Goryeo people began their efforts to resume foreign trades with the outer world. Not only civilian merchants but the royal family and central government as well conducted vibrant trades with their Chinese counterparts who were operating throughout the empire. In the process, Goryeo porcelain, Insam and ramie products, being the most sought-for items by foreign customers, were the ones exported most.
The main focus of this article is placed on the Goryeo ramie products of the time, which had been a well-known Goryeo specialty for centuries at that point, yet today is an historical entity which is yet to receive proper attention, as questions like how much of them were actually exported to China or which level of product power did they display inside the Chinese market have never been sufficiently examined or answered. To solve that problem, this article pursued to determine the Goryeo government’s own trade policy, which would have determined not only the overall quality but quantity as well of all the ramie reserves that exited the Goryeo realm.
Among many kings who graced the history of Goryeo-foreign trades, King Chungseon may arguably be the one who contributed to the overall trend the most. He carefully monitored the internal conditions of the Chinese silk market, and was well-versed in the Imperial government’s policy shifts concerning foreign trade-generated profits. He noticed the changing nature of relationships between China and important producers of vital products along the maritime Silk road, and when he received a visit from an Indian (Mabaar) delegation, he decided it was time to bring out an asset the Goryeo people had for a long time, enhance it with superior patterning technology inspired by all the Western silks flooding the Goryeo market at the time, and sell them to Chinese shores. To that end he opened a new office called Jig’yeom-guk, encouraged the officials and technicians in charge to develop a new type of ramie called Jikmun Jeopo, and paved a way for future kings to mass produce and export them to not only China but regions beyond East Asia.
The main focus of this article is placed on the Goryeo ramie products of the time, which had been a well-known Goryeo specialty for centuries at that point, yet today is an historical entity which is yet to receive proper attention, as questions like how much of them were actually exported to China or which level of product power did they display inside the Chinese market have never been sufficiently examined or answered. To solve that problem, this article pursued to determine the Goryeo government’s own trade policy, which would have determined not only the overall quality but quantity as well of all the ramie reserves that exited the Goryeo realm.
Among many kings who graced the history of Goryeo-foreign trades, King Chungseon may arguably be the one who contributed to the overall trend the most. He carefully monitored the internal conditions of the Chinese silk market, and was well-versed in the Imperial government’s policy shifts concerning foreign trade-generated profits. He noticed the changing nature of relationships between China and important producers of vital products along the maritime Silk road, and when he received a visit from an Indian (Mabaar) delegation, he decided it was time to bring out an asset the Goryeo people had for a long time, enhance it with superior patterning technology inspired by all the Western silks flooding the Goryeo market at the time, and sell them to Chinese shores. To that end he opened a new office called Jig’yeom-guk, encouraged the officials and technicians in charge to develop a new type of ramie called Jikmun Jeopo, and paved a way for future kings to mass produce and export them to not only China but regions beyond East Asia.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 저포 상품화 및 수출 여건의 조성
Ⅲ. 충선왕의 직물 생산 정책
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
13~14세기 고려 지식인의 시대 인식과 정체성
역사와현실
2020 .03
-
Personal Trajectories and National History: Why the Goryeo People Went to the Mongol Empire and How They Lived There
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2024 .12
-
13∼14세기 요동 고려인 세력과 고려 왕실의 충돌
한국사연구
2018 .06
-
고구려인가 기자조선인가: 몽골제국에서 고려 역사상의 경합
역사와현실
2022 .09
-
주몽고려, 궁예고려, 왕건고려, 코리아의 단절과 계승
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
고려는 어쩌다가 고구려를 계승한 나라로 인식됐을까
역사와현실
2021 .09
-
고려-몽골(원) 관계사 연구를 위한 노력과 종합적 시각의 모색
역사학보
2025 .03
-
해방직후 고려 국호론의 전개와 고려 표상
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
고려가 몽골제국에 바라는 것 - 김구(金坵)의 외교문서에 표현된 원종 대 양국관계의 재구성 -
한국사연구
2022 .12
-
원간섭기 근친금혼 관념의 강화와 수계혼(收繼婚) 도입 시도
역사와현실
2016 .03
-
『고려사』에 인용된 原典의 句節
역사교육논집
2016 .01
-
가사 不傳 고려가요의 생성연대와 수용양상
우리어문연구
2022 .09
-
교과서의 고려시대 대외관계사 쟁점 연구
역사교육
2017 .09
-
고려를 찾은 동아시아 고승
동양고전연구
2020 .01
-
Perception of Goryeo Celadon in the Context of the Late Joseon Period
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2021 .06
-
고려전기 영토분쟁과 보주 확보에 관한 외교사적 고찰
인문사회과학연구
2024 .05
-
고려 사신의 몽골 잠치(站赤) 이용
사학연구
2019 .06
-
「『高麗圖經』 譯註」(3) : 권2 「世次」편의 분석을 중심으로
한국사학보
2017 .05
-
역사·한국사 교과서 ‘고려‐ 몽골 관계’ 서사 재구성 제안
역사교육
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-001912080