메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제11권 제4호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
317 - 337 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the launch of the WTO system, there have been serious concerns that the newly introduced provisions, such as GATS and TRIPS, mainly reflected the interests of advanced nations. Based on disputes related to GATS and TRIPS brought to its settlement system for the last 20 years, this paper analyzes the supposed biases of the newly introduced provisions toward advanced nations. Through a basic descriptive statistical analysis and a more sophisticated empirical analysis with the help of logistic regression models, this paper shows that advanced nations in fact outperform developing nations. That is, advanced nations not only have brought major proportions of disputes related with newly introduced provisions but also had much favorable outcomes than developing nations. It has been shown that the U. S. was the most active complainant while the EU and other advanced nations were more frequently targeted in the disputes related to the newly introduced provisions. Although not all disputes were toward developing nations, the US was the most successful complainant as well as respondent in terms of dispute settlements outcomes. As all the results mentioned here were proven to have statistical significance, such results supported the arguments that the current contents of the newly introduced provisions of the WTO agreements favored the advanced nations, especially for the U. S.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0