메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
채보원 (경북대학교) 박기덕 (경북대학교)
저널정보
한국발육발달학회 한국발육발달학회지 한국발육발달학회지 제30권 제3호
발행연도
2022.8
수록면
299 - 304 (6page)
DOI
10.34284/KJGD.2022.08.30.3.299

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is known that physical imbalance caused by overuse of electronic devices causes a decrease in FMS and balance, and when physical deformation occurs, it also affects walking. Previous studies have primarily examined the physical fitness of older people, patients, or elite athletes. Therefore, the purpose is was compare FMS, static balance, and gait patterns of current adult men and women, examine what kind of difference appears, and use it as an index for future exercise program design and data for adult men and women. The subjects of the study were 10 adult males and 10 adult females who underwent FMS, static balance, and gait patterns tests. Independent t-tests were performed to examine differences in FMS, static balance, and gait patterns between groups using the SPSS 26.0 statistical program, with all statistical significance levels set to p<.05. In the first research results, FMS showed that active straight leg raise were higher in adult females(p<.001) and Trunk stability push up was higher in adult males(p<.001). Second, in gait patterns, Cadence was shown to be statistically significantly higher in adult females(p<.05). Therefore, adult males showed inadequate leg flexibility, and adult females showed weakened upper extremity muscle strength. In addition, it was found that the static balance showed a decrease in balance ability for both adult males and females as a whole, and that the adult females had a high Cadence when walking. Post-mortem studies that can prevent injuries should be conducted by verifying the effects of programs that enhance physical function that have declined in the future.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-692-001612719