지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article reviewed the life of Kim Si-Yang (金時讓), and his historical consciousness by analyzing his writings, namely, the Baegyegimun (涪溪紀聞), the Jahaepildam (紫海筆談), and the Hadampasuklok (荷潭破寂錄), etc. Kim was a Confucian scholar who lived throughout the late 16th century and mid-17th century, enduring the time of hardship. In 1612 (4th year by the reign of King Gwanghae), he was exiled to Jongseong, Hamgyeong-do, for posing a ’tabooed question’ for an official examination. In 1618, after 7 years of exile in Jongseong, Kim was relocated to Yeonghae, Gyeongsangbuk-do, before being released from the exile in 1623 due to the Restoration by King Injo. For the 12 years of poor and miserable exile, he devoted himself to researches, enhancing his knowledge and view on the Korean history. In other words, it was the time of the exile that offered Kim a chance to crystallize his thoughts and experiences to write the three books that gained much praise by his successors.
Kim viewed the reality of his era, as well as the contemporary Confucian scholars, with differentiated view and criticism. He lamented on the reality where the descendents of the unjust thrive and the descendents of the righteous declined, and emphasized that the reason behind the paradox are lack of historical consciousness and unjust publication of Korean history. In particular, Kim stressed that the Confucian scholars of Joseon lacked education on the history of Joseon, and rather, propagated incorrect historical knowledge. In his point of view, the history education of Joseon didn’t serve its function as mirror of politics and ethics, and he wrote the books in order to correct the errors. Kim may have lived a bitter personal life during the time of national hardship, but he tried his best to keep his criticism on the era and serve his responsibility in the Korean history.
Kim viewed the reality of his era, as well as the contemporary Confucian scholars, with differentiated view and criticism. He lamented on the reality where the descendents of the unjust thrive and the descendents of the righteous declined, and emphasized that the reason behind the paradox are lack of historical consciousness and unjust publication of Korean history. In particular, Kim stressed that the Confucian scholars of Joseon lacked education on the history of Joseon, and rather, propagated incorrect historical knowledge. In his point of view, the history education of Joseon didn’t serve its function as mirror of politics and ethics, and he wrote the books in order to correct the errors. Kim may have lived a bitter personal life during the time of national hardship, but he tried his best to keep his criticism on the era and serve his responsibility in the Korean history.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 가계와 생애
Ⅲ. 김시양의 역사의식
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
하담(荷潭) 김시양(金時讓)의 정치적 상황 예측과 그 의미
온지논총
2023 .04
-
荷潭 金時讓의 散文 硏究
漢文古典硏究
2021 .01
-
荷潭 金時讓의 실제성 중시의 사상
한국인물사연구
2016 .09
-
劉大櫆 記文 硏究
중국문학연구
2021 .01
-
원중거의 『승사록』 소재 필담 검토 -서술 의도와 효과를 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2020 .01
-
羅洪先의 主靜體悟說과 惟一萬殊의 도덕형이상학적 원리 - 寂體感用의 방식을 중심으로 -
양명학
2019 .12
-
가지산 석남사(石南寺)의 도의(道義) 창건설에 대한 비판적 고찰
불교학보
2020 .06
-
중일한 현대 한자음에서 파찰음의 대응양상
중국조선어문
2023 .09
-
파자(破字)·참설(讖說)의 언어문화 교육적 의미와 활용 방안
국어문학
2020 .03
-
『동도필담』을 통해 본 18세기 일본의 불교 발전 양상
열상고전연구
2020 .01
-
세례와 자해, 어울리지 않는 두 의례의 공통점과 차이점
한국기독교신학논총
2022 .04
-
八友軒 趙普陽의 문예지향적 시세계
동양한문학연구
2024 .02
-
동아시아 필담문헌 기초연구: 17세기 통신사 사행록의 필담 및 시문창화 수록 양상
온지논총
2022 .04
-
초고령사회 속 ‘하류노인’ 현상 - NHK 『노인표류사회』 시리즈를 통해 본 노후빈곤 실태 -
일본문화학보
2021 .05
-
통신사 필담창화집 속의 단군･기자 관련 논의 검토
대동한문학(大東漢文學)
2019 .01
-
조선후기 부계 가족·친족의 확산과 몇 가지 문제
한국사학보
2016 .02
-
淵泉 金履陽의 문예론과 경세론에 대한 재검토
고전문학연구
2019 .01
-
试论杨朱其人及其籍贯生平
중국어문학
2019 .01
-
봉암사 결사와 그 불교사적 의미
禪學(선학)
2017 .12
-
울진 대풍헌 현판 기문류(記文類) 자료의 해제 및 번역
영토해양연구
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-905-001648523