메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
표시연 (숙명여자대학교)
저널정보
한국응용언어학회 응용언어학 응용언어학 제34권 제2호
발행연도
2018.6
수록면
3 - 30 (28page)
DOI
10.17154/kjal.2018.6.34.2.3

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The current study explores L2 learners’ linguistic behavior on hedges used in English academic prose. Focusing on stance adverbials and modals, hedging devices used by L2 learners were examined and compared with those by native English speakers(NES). First, this study starts reviewing definitions and taxonomies on hedges, according to which the written corpora are analyzed. The analysis reveals a strong propensity to use modals much more than stance adverbials as hedging devices in all the corpora. In the learner corpora, can was most frequently observed, while would in NES. Especially, it is observed that NES often use would several times with other stance expressions within one sentence, which means they vigorously use hedging as various strategies to express their stance in details. On the contrary, there were few times multiple stance expressions were used in one sentence in the learner corpus, showing the repeated use of a limited set of stance expressions. However, double hedging devices were often employed by advanced learners although they are somewhat limited patterns, such as ‘can be+p.p~’. The result reveals that epistemic stance expressing reality or a degree of certainty is the most frequently used semantic category in all corpora. When it comes to style adverbials, a clear inclination to express objectiveness other than personal feeling was observed. Such findings can be interpreted that L2 learners are actively developing their awareness of hedging in their academic prose despite somewhat limited and less formal use of hedges at intermediate level. As their English proficiency is getting advanced, they tend to employ more various and multiple rhetorical devices simultaneously to carry their stance in more attentive and objective ways, achieving sophisticated writing skills in English. The implication of these findings suggests the need for instructing discourse markers such as hedges explicitly to accelerate L2 learners’ discourse comprehension levels in an efficient manner.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구 방법
Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-701-003115181