메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
홍인숙 (선문대학교)
저널정보
다빈치미래교양연구소 교양학연구 교양학연구 제9집
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
91 - 116 (26page)
DOI
10.24173/jge.2019.06.9.4

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This research explored the ultimate direction and value of discussion course in the college liberal arts education. The goal of this research is to explore the possibility of specific methodology to realize this. Discussion course of liberal arts education in a college aims at learning two competencies, ‘critical and creative thinking ability’ and ‘rational and logical speaking skill’. For this, this research emphasized the basic aim of liberal arts education, which is liberal culture education, and humanistic value.
To realize this, this research suggested two methods of teaching. First, the design of free discussion course with the mediation of liberal arts and art. For example, free discussion of <Art and Culture> and <Contemporary Art and Human> of Keimyung University was conducted after providing students with abundant humanities knowledge and artistic experience. This led students to feel the necessity of internal communication and conduct an autonomous and active discussion.
Second, reading discussion of ‘tasting reading(味讀)’, which is a deep and slow-learning of a book. Tasting reading is slow reading, slow and deep reading by tasting and appreciating the taste of a book. The model of the lecture of tasting reading is ‘<Silver Spoon> class’, where Hashimoto Takeshi, a Japanese middle school teacher, read a coming of age novel, <Silver Spoon>, in 1950s. This way, students can discover their own tastes and preferences through a reading discussion by deeply and thoroughly reading a novel. Such reading is to enable students to ‘explore life in their own way’ and ‘discover and extend their possibility’.
Based on these two cases, this research insisted that university discussion classes should go back to the ‘foundations again’. In other words, as the liberal arts course of the university, discussion class should aim at the basic value of liberal arts, which is liberal arts and personality education.

목차

1. 서론
2. 대학 교양교육에서의 토론 교과의 쟁점: 찬반토론 형식의 교육적 효과에 대해
3. 자유교양교육의 가치라는 ‘기본’, 그리고 대학 토론 교과목의 지향
4. 결론을 대신하여
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-005-000922985