지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The very unique appearance of anterōs in the Phaedrus (255e1) has for a long time puzzled many readers and commentators, both ancient and modern, of Plato’s sublime dialogue. Some have translated it by “counter-love,” strengthening the theme of rivalry; others prefer “love-in-return” and its cognates, focusing on its reciprocal dynamics; still others understand it as “reflected love,” highlighting its qualification as an “image of love” (εἴδωλον ἔρωτος). The aim of this paper is to propose a comprehensive understanding of anterōs, encompassing these three lines of interpretation and translation, both by giving maximum coherence to the difficult passage in which it appears and by replacing it in the movement of the whole dialogue.
To do so, we first analyse the complex entwining of the similes in which anterōs seems to have a pivotal role: erōs being successively described as himeros within a physiological simile, as anterōs within an optical one, and as soul’s struggle within the psychic simile of the winged chariot (255b7-256a6). Then we conceptualise this correction of the successive similes in view of the eschatological passage about the three different kinds of lives immediately following: paiderastic erōs, by desiring a physical and asymmetric contact with the beloved, can only trigger rivalry; whereas honour-loving erōs, by desiring something beyond the beloved, can foster emulation and reciprocity; but only philosophical erōs, by reflecting intelligible beauty to the beloved, can truly guide to its recollection (256a7-b7). Finally, we see in this passage a kind of nub of the analogical unity of the dialogue, between the erotic brothers and the discursive ones: anterōs being qualified by Socrates as an eidōlon of erōs just as written logos will be qualified by Phaedrus as an eidōlon of spoken logos (276a9).
Thus, the very ambiguity of anterōs is not only due to the polysemy of the prefix anti- but also to its qualification as an eidōlon of erōs. We think that it is only by acknowledging this profound complexity of the text that we both recognise the merit of Plato’s comprehensive theory of love and the unity of surely his most beautiful dialogue.
To do so, we first analyse the complex entwining of the similes in which anterōs seems to have a pivotal role: erōs being successively described as himeros within a physiological simile, as anterōs within an optical one, and as soul’s struggle within the psychic simile of the winged chariot (255b7-256a6). Then we conceptualise this correction of the successive similes in view of the eschatological passage about the three different kinds of lives immediately following: paiderastic erōs, by desiring a physical and asymmetric contact with the beloved, can only trigger rivalry; whereas honour-loving erōs, by desiring something beyond the beloved, can foster emulation and reciprocity; but only philosophical erōs, by reflecting intelligible beauty to the beloved, can truly guide to its recollection (256a7-b7). Finally, we see in this passage a kind of nub of the analogical unity of the dialogue, between the erotic brothers and the discursive ones: anterōs being qualified by Socrates as an eidōlon of erōs just as written logos will be qualified by Phaedrus as an eidōlon of spoken logos (276a9).
Thus, the very ambiguity of anterōs is not only due to the polysemy of the prefix anti- but also to its qualification as an eidōlon of erōs. We think that it is only by acknowledging this profound complexity of the text that we both recognise the merit of Plato’s comprehensive theory of love and the unity of surely his most beautiful dialogue.
목차
Abstract
1. The correction of the successive similes (255b7-256a6)
2. The mutual elevation of the souls (256a7-257a2)
3. The unity of the Phaedrus: Erōs and Logos
Bibliography
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
Belfiore, E. S. / 2012 / Socrates’ Daimonic Art : Love for Wisdom in Four Platonic Dialogues / Cambridge University Press
Bonazzi, M. / 2011 / Platone: Fedro / Giulio Einaudi Editore
Brisson, L. / 1992 / L’unité du Phèdre de Platon. Rhétorique et philosophie dans le Phèdre / Understanding the Phaedrus, Proceedings of the II Symposium Platonicum :61~76
Brisson, L. / 2004 / Platon: Phèdre / Flammarion
Buffière, F. / 2007 / Éros adolescent. La pédérastie dans la Grèce ancienne / Les Belles Lettres
Bonazzi, M. / 2011 / Platone: Fedro / Giulio Einaudi Editore
Brisson, L. / 1992 / L’unité du Phèdre de Platon. Rhétorique et philosophie dans le Phèdre / Understanding the Phaedrus, Proceedings of the II Symposium Platonicum :61~76
Brisson, L. / 2004 / Platon: Phèdre / Flammarion
Buffière, F. / 2007 / Éros adolescent. La pédérastie dans la Grèce ancienne / Les Belles Lettres
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고대 그리스에서 정치적 에로스 담론 : 헤시오도스, 투퀴디데스 그리고 플라톤을 중심으로
철학논총
2017 .10
-
Plato’s Perfect Sophist: Diotima and Likeness (eikōn)
서양고전학연구
2024 .12
-
현대중국어 직유 표현의 구성 요소
중국어문학논집
2024 .08
-
A Feature-Based Analysis of Similes and Metaphors in Metaphor Theory
담화와인지
2019 .02
-
‘같은’ 수식 명사구 구문에 나타난 직유 분석
언어
2019 .12
-
Verb-derived Simile Markers in Korean : A Grammaticalization Perspective
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2016 .11
-
표현구조 측면에서 본 한･중 관용적 직유 표현의 언어문화적 차이에 대한 연구 - 중국인 학습자의 직유 표현 사용 양상을 중심으로 -
동서인문학
2022 .02
-
불교경전『금강경(金剛經)』,『천수경(千手經)』의한국어 번역에 나타난 직유 표현 연구
통번역교육연구
2015 .01
-
Korean Noun-Derived Simile Markers
언어과학연구
2019 .09
-
루이지노 브루니(Luigino Bruni)의 ‘상호성(Reciprocity)’ 개념 고찰
인문사회과학연구
2024 .02
-
Revisiting Figurative Speech and Tandem-based Translation Courses: A Simile Case Study
통번역교육연구
2019 .01
-
The Perpetuated Hostility in the Inter-Korean Rivalry: A Theory of Multilevel Veto Players and the Persistence of South-North Korean Rivalry, 1954-2007
Korea Observer
2018 .06
-
현우형제담(賢愚兄弟譚)의 경쟁과 삶의 균형
문학치료연구
2016 .10
-
“Against Simon” and “On a Wound by Premeditation”: Lysias’ Court Speech Writing Career as the Legal Background of the Phaedrus
서양고전학연구
2020 .12
-
제도의 폭력과 모성 : 토니 모리슨의 『빌러비드』(Beloved ) 속의 노예제와 모성애의 다양한 양상
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2015 .10
-
산 자와 죽은 자의 사랑: 『빌러비드』
영미어문학
2015 .03
-
비유적 의미 분석을 통한 어휘의 의미 확장 가능성
언어와 문화
2015 .01
-
On the Content and form of a Philosophical Consultation
Journal of Humanities Therapy
2023 .12
-
설득과 판단의 근거 : 플라톤의 『크리톤』을 중심으로
수사학
2016 .08
-
『빌러비드』에 나타난 세드의 자기 징벌 편집증—팔루스와 강박을 중심으로
영어영문학연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-800-000120043