지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
「The Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on Insolvency Proceedings」(hereinafter ‘the previous EU Insolvency Regulation’) which controls cross-border insolvency proceedings embraced a wide range of problems. Firstly, the scope of application restricted to single debtor entities and there were defects in dealing with the multinational corporate cases. Secondly, debtors have shifted the center of main interests(COMI) to obtain a more favourable legal position and interests(forum shopping issues). Thirdly, in the event of the conflict between insolvency proceedings and arbitration proceedings, what applicable law would be governed.
「The Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on Insolvency Proceedings(recast)」(hereinafter ‘the recast EU Insolvency Regulation’) reforms the previous EU Insolvency Regulation to enhance the effective administration of cross-border insolvency proceedings.
There are some of the key features of the recast EU Insolvency Regulation. Firstly, the extension of its application to pre-insolvency proceedings which promote the rescue of economically viable but distressed business and give a second chance to debtors. Secondly, preventing the problem of abusive COMI relocation(forum shopping issues). Thirdly, the introduction of new procedures with the aim of facilitating cross-border coordination and cooperation between insolvency practitioners and the courts in different Member States relating to members of the same group of companies. Finally, the conflicts of law problems that occur when the insolvency proceedings are in one country and the seat of the arbitration is in another.
In particular, with regard to the conflicts of law, the recast EU Insolvency Regulation prescribes what applicable law will govern the insolvency proceedings. The principle is that the insolvency laws of the opening court will apply to the insolvency proceedings(lex fori concursus). However, In relation to the impact of insolvency of a party on pending arbitration proceedings, the recent decision gives the law of the seat of the arbitration a more prominent role and the recast EU Insolvency Regulation also stipulates that the effects of insolvency proceedings on pending arbitral proceedings concerning an asset or a right which forms part of a debtor’s insolvency estate shall be governed by the law of the Member State in which the arbitral tribunal has its seat.
「The Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on Insolvency Proceedings(recast)」(hereinafter ‘the recast EU Insolvency Regulation’) reforms the previous EU Insolvency Regulation to enhance the effective administration of cross-border insolvency proceedings.
There are some of the key features of the recast EU Insolvency Regulation. Firstly, the extension of its application to pre-insolvency proceedings which promote the rescue of economically viable but distressed business and give a second chance to debtors. Secondly, preventing the problem of abusive COMI relocation(forum shopping issues). Thirdly, the introduction of new procedures with the aim of facilitating cross-border coordination and cooperation between insolvency practitioners and the courts in different Member States relating to members of the same group of companies. Finally, the conflicts of law problems that occur when the insolvency proceedings are in one country and the seat of the arbitration is in another.
In particular, with regard to the conflicts of law, the recast EU Insolvency Regulation prescribes what applicable law will govern the insolvency proceedings. The principle is that the insolvency laws of the opening court will apply to the insolvency proceedings(lex fori concursus). However, In relation to the impact of insolvency of a party on pending arbitration proceedings, the recent decision gives the law of the seat of the arbitration a more prominent role and the recast EU Insolvency Regulation also stipulates that the effects of insolvency proceedings on pending arbitral proceedings concerning an asset or a right which forms part of a debtor’s insolvency estate shall be governed by the law of the Member State in which the arbitral tribunal has its seat.
목차
Ⅰ. 글을 시작하며
Ⅱ. 재판관할 규정
Ⅲ. 준거법 규정
Ⅳ. 그 밖의 주요 개정 내용
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국제중재절차와 국제도산절차의 경합
국제사법연구
2019 .12
-
외국도산절차의 승인 제도
국제사법연구
2022 .06
-
유럽연합(EU)에서의 도산관련재판
법학평론
2024 .04
-
「유럽의회와 유럽연합이사회의 2015년 5월 20일 도산절차에 관한 2015/848(EU) 규정(재구성)」에 관한 검토 : 전문(Recital)에 관한 시역(試譯)을 중심으로
국제사법연구
2015 .12
-
중재합의 당사자의 파산이 중재에 미치는 영향에 관한 고찰
중재연구
2024 .06
-
국제도산과 담보권 - 2015 EU도산규정을 중심으로 -
저스티스
2020 .10
-
유럽연합 도산법제의 발전과 시사점
법조
2019 .01
-
해운기업의 도산과 관련된 법률문제
법학평론
2019 .04
-
개정 EU 도산규정 : 기업집단 국제도산을 중심으로
국제사법연구
2018 .06
-
국제도산에 관한 UNCITRAL 모델법과 우리 법의 비교
비교사법
2018 .11
-
도산해지조항의 효력
비교사법
2018 .05
-
Gibbs Rule에 관한 주요국가의 현황과 전망
국제사법연구
2022 .06
-
기업집단 도산에 관한 UNCITRAL 모델법 검토 - 기획도산절차, 의제절차와 기업집단도산계획을 중심으로
법학연구
2019 .11
-
도산절차에서 임금채권을 둘러싼 법적 쟁점
한양법학
2016 .05
-
关于跨境海事破产中船舶扣押的相关研究
회생법학
2024 .06
-
중국의 과경(국제)파산절차의 승인 및 지원 제도에 관한 최근의 동향
회생법학
2022 .12
-
한진해운의 도산 관련 민사사건의 판결 동향 Ⅱ - 해외 선박대리점의 대리점 비용 청구 사건: 도산절차의 개시가 중재에 미치는 영향-
한국해법학회지
2019 .01
-
프랑스 국제도산법의 소개 및 우리 법과의 비교
국제사법연구
2018 .12
-
기업 재무자료를 활용한 설비건설기업 부실위험예측에 관한 연구
중소기업금융연구
2024 .09
-
도산해지조항의 효력에 관한 일고찰
동아법학
2022 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-360-001259727