지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.2
- 수록면
- 187 - 218 (32page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2024.2.35.1.187
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Already in the United States and other countries, projects using matching programs in the field of expert system and law are being actively carried out. In addition to the fact that intelligent reasoning systems can be established under the current computer knowledge processing system, it is difficult to cope effectively with the current legal system due to the expansion of artificial intelligence, and it is necessary to establish a full-fledged legal and regulatory system to deal with various problems such as human rights violations.
On the other hand, among the legal parties to the trust, the trustee can be said to be the only, absolute, and exclusive authority to manage and dispose of the trust property, and depending on the perspective, it can be said to be a special legal party. Therefore, the trustee is burdened with special obligations beyond those required by the general contracting party. In this study, due to the breakthrough development of the expert system, the criteria for judging violations of trustee obligations that may appear at the stage where artificial intelligence assists and replaces the trustee"s role in trust affairs and the resulting responsibility relationship was considered. In particular, it was carried out centering on the most extensive and core duty of care.
More specifically, in this study, it was divided into two stages as follows.
a) As artificial intelligence (weak artificial narrow intelligence or weak A.I.) in the current situation, the degree of violation of the obligation to pay attention to the trustee and the legal responsibility thereof are reviewed
b) When trust affairs are processed by artificial general intelligence robots with the same capabilities as humans with so-called autonomous artificial intelligence (artificial general intelligence or strong A.I.), we tried to examine the judgment of violation of the obligation to pay attention from various perspectives.
On the other hand, among the legal parties to the trust, the trustee can be said to be the only, absolute, and exclusive authority to manage and dispose of the trust property, and depending on the perspective, it can be said to be a special legal party. Therefore, the trustee is burdened with special obligations beyond those required by the general contracting party. In this study, due to the breakthrough development of the expert system, the criteria for judging violations of trustee obligations that may appear at the stage where artificial intelligence assists and replaces the trustee"s role in trust affairs and the resulting responsibility relationship was considered. In particular, it was carried out centering on the most extensive and core duty of care.
More specifically, in this study, it was divided into two stages as follows.
a) As artificial intelligence (weak artificial narrow intelligence or weak A.I.) in the current situation, the degree of violation of the obligation to pay attention to the trustee and the legal responsibility thereof are reviewed
b) When trust affairs are processed by artificial general intelligence robots with the same capabilities as humans with so-called autonomous artificial intelligence (artificial general intelligence or strong A.I.), we tried to examine the judgment of violation of the obligation to pay attention from various perspectives.
#인공지능
#AI
#스마트계약
#지능형 에이전트
#4차산업혁명
#딥러닝
#약한 인공지능
#강한 인공지능
#로봇
#자율성
#수탁자
#선관주의의무
#신인의무
#전자적 인격
#권리능력
#불법행위
#과실책임
#위험책임
#The Fourth Industrial Revolution
#Artificial Intelligence (AI)
#Smart Contract
#Intelligent Agent
#Deep Learning
#Weak Artificial Intelligence
#Strong Artificial Intelligence
#Robot
#Autonomy
#Duty of Care
#Fiduciary Duty
#Trustee
#Electronic Person
#Capacity
#Tort
#Fault liability
#Risk Liability
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 인공지능기술 발전과 「신탁법」상 수탁자의 선관주의의무와의 상관관계
Ⅲ. 보조형(약한) 인공지능과 수탁자의 선관주의의무 위반 판단
Ⅳ. 대체형(강한) 인공지능과 수탁자의 선관주의의무 위반 판단
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
형법상 인(人)의 개념에 대한 재정립 – 인공지능시스템에 대한 법인격 부여 여부를 중심으로 –
경희법학
2022 .12
-
인공지능 규제에 관한 소고
동아법학
2022 .11
-
수탁자의 이익상반행위의 효력
한양법학
2015 .02
-
인공지능 로봇에 관한 법적 고찰
경희법학
2020 .01
-
인공지능을 이용한 행위에 대한 법적인 평가 - 사법(私法)상 논의를 위한 시론(試論 또는 始論) -
외법논집
2019 .01
-
신탁수탁자의 선관주의의무
비교사법
2015 .05
-
인공지능 의료행위와 법적 책임에 관한 연구
비교사법
2020 .11
-
인공지능 로봇의 형사법이론 체계에 관한 일고 : 범죄능력 · 형사책임능력을 중심으로
법학연구
2018 .09
-
중요도-만족도 분석을 활용한 인공지능 기반의 서비스 전략 연구
서비스경영학회지
2021 .06
-
인공지능에 대한 민사책임 법리
재산법연구
2018 .01
-
인공지능 활용에 따른 법적 책임과 윤리에 관한 동향
과학기술과 법
2021 .01
-
人工知能로봇과 賠償責任에 관한 小考
안암법학
2018 .01
-
수탁자 의무위반 행위의 사법적 효력과 수익자 취소권
증권법연구
2016 .08
-
인공지능과 민주주의에 관한 소고
헌법재판연구
2021 .12
-
인공지능 로봇은 법인격을 가질 수 있는가?
저스티스
2021 .06
-
인공지능(AI)과 로봇기술의 전개에 따른 호텔산업종사원의 인식과 영향 및 대응방안 연구*
호텔리조트연구
2018 .01
-
수학교육의 변화와 인공지능과의 연관성 탐색
수학교육 논문집
2018 .01
-
인공지능 모빌리티 도입에 따른 제조물책임법 개정방안 검토
저스티스
2024 .08
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0