지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2007.12
- 수록면
- 19 - 300 (284page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aims of this research were to examine the trends of perjury and measure of perjury prevention in Korea.
This study was performed by using the following methods. 1) Reviewing previous study and the comparative law 2) Examining the trends during last 10 years, in which appeared in the official statistics published by Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, 3) Analyzing the court judicial records on 244 perjury cases, 4) Conducting experiment on university students with attitude on perjury and preventive measures of perjury
Major finding from the present research can be summarized as followings; 1) The perjury crime rate is increased from 1999, while decreased in 2002 and 2003, to 2004. Perjury crime rate is exceedingly high in 2005, 2) Suspicion accounts for 60 percent of clue for investigation, in civil cases accusation accounts for 100 percent. 3) Most of motivation for perjury was the request from close relationships such as friends and family, and even people used to commit perjury voluntarily. 4) The pecuniary punishment accounts for about half of first instance sentence. In penal servitude, below one year accounts for about half of servitude. 5) In experiment. attitude to law and religious faith were not significantly correlated with attitude to perjury in statistics, but heavy punishment was to prevent perjury more effectively than light punishment. In addition, the deponent and the closed statement were not particularly effective.
Based on research, suggestions for preventive measures of perjury are followed; 1) There is need for establishing new law of false statement crime without deponent 2) Also, there is need for increasing steadied sentence, 3) Additionally, there are need for reforming examination of a witness to intense hearing as well as taking protection of the victim, witness.
This study was performed by using the following methods. 1) Reviewing previous study and the comparative law 2) Examining the trends during last 10 years, in which appeared in the official statistics published by Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, 3) Analyzing the court judicial records on 244 perjury cases, 4) Conducting experiment on university students with attitude on perjury and preventive measures of perjury
Major finding from the present research can be summarized as followings; 1) The perjury crime rate is increased from 1999, while decreased in 2002 and 2003, to 2004. Perjury crime rate is exceedingly high in 2005, 2) Suspicion accounts for 60 percent of clue for investigation, in civil cases accusation accounts for 100 percent. 3) Most of motivation for perjury was the request from close relationships such as friends and family, and even people used to commit perjury voluntarily. 4) The pecuniary punishment accounts for about half of first instance sentence. In penal servitude, below one year accounts for about half of servitude. 5) In experiment. attitude to law and religious faith were not significantly correlated with attitude to perjury in statistics, but heavy punishment was to prevent perjury more effectively than light punishment. In addition, the deponent and the closed statement were not particularly effective.
Based on research, suggestions for preventive measures of perjury are followed; 1) There is need for establishing new law of false statement crime without deponent 2) Also, there is need for increasing steadied sentence, 3) Additionally, there are need for reforming examination of a witness to intense hearing as well as taking protection of the victim, witness.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 현행법상 위증죄와 위증의 원인
제3장 공식통계를 통해 본 위증범죄의 동향
제4장 기록조사에 나타난 위증의 실태
제5장 위증에 관한 실험
제6장 위증억지를 위한 방안
제7장 결론
참고문헌
영문초록
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대학생들의 위증에 대한 태도와 위증의도에 영향을 미치는 변인에 대한 연구
아주법학
2010 .01
-
위증범죄에 대한 효과적 대처방안
원광법학
2017 .01
-
위증죄에 대한 몇 가지 소고
인권과 정의
2017 .01
-
위증 범죄의 양형에 관한 경험적 연구: 제1기 양형기준 적용현황 분석
홍익법학
2011 .01
-
증언거부권의 불고지와 위증죄
형사법연구
2010 .01
-
위증범죄군 집행유예 선고 기준 검증: 범죄기록과 허위진술의 영향력의 가중치
한국공안행정학회보
2014 .01
-
증언거부권과 위증죄의 성부 : 판례이론의 분석을 중심으로
강원법학
2015 .02
-
자수 규정에 관한 고찰
형사정책연구
2006 .03
-
위증죄의 소송법 및 실체법의 성립요건
아주법학
2014 .01
-
증인의 신용성 판단기일의 도입에 관한 연구
홍익법학
2010 .01
-
미디어 멀티태스킹과 게이미피케이션을 통해 발현한 실시간 참여 민주주의 : 다이내믹 토픽 모델링(DTM)을 활용한 인터넷 게시판 분석
한국방송학보
2017 .05
-
刑事上 證據ㆍ資料의 開示의 定立方向
법학연구
2002 .12
-
범인도피죄와 위증죄에서 자기 사건 교사의 처벌가능성
저스티스
2019 .04
-
형법상 진술 및 유포 행위의 ‘허위성’ 요건에 대한 고찰 - 대법원 판례에 나타난 허위성 개념의 주관과 객관의 관계에 대한 분석을 중심으로 -
형사법연구
2018 .01
-
양형실태 분석을 통한 양형기준 개선방안 고찰* - 양형기준 시행 후의 횡령·배임죄 판결을 중심으로 -
형사법연구
2013 .01
-
대법원 양형기준에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 피고인의 이익에 부합하는 양형기준의 해석을 중심으로 -
형사법연구
2012 .01
-
범죄피해자보호 관련법제 개선방안 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
사법방해죄와 법정모독죄의 도입여부
법학연구
2010 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003949559