메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국공학교육학회 공학교육연구 공학교육연구 제20권 제5호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
14 - 22 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This research aims to explore characteristics of engineering students’ thinking styles compared with those of undergraduate studentsin Korea. For this, we investigated whether there were differences of thinking styles in undergraduates according to majors and gender. 'Thinking styles', one individual-difference variable, has received particular attention in recent years. Styles are not abilities but ratherrefer to individuals' preferred way of applying their abilities in cognitive tasks(Sternberg, 1988). There has been much research(domesticand foreign) about thinking styles and their related factors. However, to date, little attention has been paid to engineering students’thinking styles, and few studies have dealt with them together with undergraduate students’ of various majors. This study was conductedwith a total of 865 students from 3 universities, and thinking styles have been measured online. Our findings show that firstly, therewere significant differences in undergraduate students’ thinking styles by majors. Engineering students scored significantly higher inexternal style, students majoring in humanities scored higher in executive, hierarchical and conservative styles, and students majoringin arts scored higher in legislative, internal and liberal styles. Second, there was a significant difference in students’ thinking stylesby gender. Male students scored significantly higher than females in judicial, global and external styles. Whereas female studentsscored higher than males in hierarchical and internal styles. Third, there was a significant difference in engineering students’ thinkingstyles by gender. Male engineering students scored significantly higher than females in judicial and monarchic styles. Whereas femaleengineering students scored significantly higher in hierarchical styles. Based on these findings, it is expected to apply thinking stylesto develop related courses as well as programs for engineering students.
#Thinking Styles #Engineering Students #Differences by Gender & #amp # Majors #External #Judicial #Hierarchical Styles

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청
Cheung, C. / 2003 / Creativity of university students : What is the impact of field and year study? / Journal of creative behavior 37 (1) : 42 ~ 63 google schola Cilliers, C. D. / 2001 / Thinking Styles : Implications for optimising learning and teaching in university education / South African Journal of Higher Education 15 (1) : 13 google schola Dai, D. Y. / 1999 / A validation study of the thinking styles inventory : Implications for gifted education / Roeper Review 21 (4) : 302 ~ 307 google schola Jacobson, C. M. / 1993 / Cognitive styles of creativity : Relations of scores on the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator among manager google schola Kim, J. / 1995 / The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students / Educ google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0