메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김희철 (원광대학교)
저널정보
안암법학회 안암법학 안암법학 제48호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
259 - 280 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The regulation of director or CEO remuneration is one of the most controversial topics addressed in corporate governance area today. Coping with a series of excessive remuneration scandal, Australia has had a say-on-pay requirement in place since 2005, starting with a mandatory nonbinding shareholder vote on the remuneration report. Since July 1, 2011, however, the nonbinding vote on the remuneration report was replaced by a binding vote, the so-called two-strikes regime. Under this regime, if 25% or more of shareholders vote against a company’s remuneration report at two consecutive annual general meetings (AGMs), the board is subject to a so-called “spill” motion. If the spill motion receives the support of 50% or more of the company’s shareholders, then a separate general meeting must be called within 90 days at which all directors except for executive directors must stand for re-election. Introducing the two strikes say on pay as well as other regulations such as directors’ report, remuneration committee, and corporate governance principles and recommendations which adopt “if not, why not” approach(same as the U.K. comply or explain), the author applies the Australian legal structures to the Korea regulatory issues on directors’ remuneration. The author also insists the necessity for the revision of Korean directors’ remuneration regulations.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0