지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第160輯
- 발행연도
- 2022.9
- 수록면
- 211 - 244 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2022.9.160.211
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
round 1644, when Qing completed the occupation of Beijing, there were remarkable changes in the relationship between Joseon-Qing. The heavy ‘Annual Tribute Payment’ imposed on Joseon was greatly reduced, and Crown Prince Sohyeon, who had been held as a hostage, returned to Joseon. In addition, regular envoys to the Qing were also integrated once a year, and the amount of gift provided for Qing envoys was also reduced. The Joseon-Qing relationship, which had been characterized bya series of tensions and conflicts, seemed to begin stabilizing from Ming-Qing Transition.
Existing studies have consistently focused on Qing’s “Enterting the Pass” as a decisive factor in these changes around 1644. In fact, the Ming fall and the Qing conquest of China removed major variables in the Joseon-Qing relationship. At that time, regency Dorgon also decided to send Crown Prince Sohyeon back to Joseon, and cited the Qing conquest of China as the reason. In other words, since then Qing’s “Enterting the Pass” has been pointed out as a marked watershed in the Joseon-Qing relationship, and Crown Prince Sohyeon’s return has been regarded as supporting the idea.
However, the changes in the Joseon-Qing relationship are not explained by “Enter the Pass” alone. This is because that began in 1643, a year before “Entering the Pass” by Qing. Therefore, I think there was another variable worth our attention, other than “Enter the Pass” against a background of the conversion of the Joseon-Qing relationship. In this study, it is the regency of Dorgon that is presented as the keyvariable.
After Hong Taiji’s death in 1643, Dorgon, who seized power in an unusual way, used Joseon to extend his power base. Immediately after Dorgon became regent, he planned and realized Crown Prince Sohyeon’s second return. It was to strengthen ties with Crown Prince Sohyeon, the next heir to the throne of Joseon. Crown Prince Sohyeon’s second return was to show Dorgon’s strategy for Joseon in advance. After “Entering the Pass,” Dorgon tried to augment his influence in Joseon by permanently returning Crown Prince Sohyeon. The challenge of getting adequate compensation for his investment has begun.
Existing studies have consistently focused on Qing’s “Enterting the Pass” as a decisive factor in these changes around 1644. In fact, the Ming fall and the Qing conquest of China removed major variables in the Joseon-Qing relationship. At that time, regency Dorgon also decided to send Crown Prince Sohyeon back to Joseon, and cited the Qing conquest of China as the reason. In other words, since then Qing’s “Enterting the Pass” has been pointed out as a marked watershed in the Joseon-Qing relationship, and Crown Prince Sohyeon’s return has been regarded as supporting the idea.
However, the changes in the Joseon-Qing relationship are not explained by “Enter the Pass” alone. This is because that began in 1643, a year before “Entering the Pass” by Qing. Therefore, I think there was another variable worth our attention, other than “Enter the Pass” against a background of the conversion of the Joseon-Qing relationship. In this study, it is the regency of Dorgon that is presented as the keyvariable.
After Hong Taiji’s death in 1643, Dorgon, who seized power in an unusual way, used Joseon to extend his power base. Immediately after Dorgon became regent, he planned and realized Crown Prince Sohyeon’s second return. It was to strengthen ties with Crown Prince Sohyeon, the next heir to the throne of Joseon. Crown Prince Sohyeon’s second return was to show Dorgon’s strategy for Joseon in advance. After “Entering the Pass,” Dorgon tried to augment his influence in Joseon by permanently returning Crown Prince Sohyeon. The challenge of getting adequate compensation for his investment has begun.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 조선의 시도
3. 상황의 전환
4. 도르곤의 기획
5. 도르곤의 의도
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
외교문서를 통해 본 도르곤 섭정기 조·청 외교
동양사학연구
2023 .09
-
The Rule of Hong Taiji and the Use of Policies toward Joseon
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2023 .12
-
東珠와 珍珠 - 淸初 만주 황실의 眞珠 채취와 소비
동양사학연구
2022 .12
-
英祖代 思悼世子 대리청정기 종묘 의례시행 양상
역사와 담론
2023 .10
-
조선후기 龍洞宮의 思悼世子 願堂 관리 - 수원 龍珠寺의 사례를 중심으로 -
古文書硏究
2020 .01
-
인조대 구궐(舊闕) 동궁(東宮) 중건과 후계구도 변경 - 『저승전의궤(儲承殿儀軌)』의 분석 -
역사와실학
2024 .11
-
영조대 채제공(蔡濟恭)의 정치 활동과 대응 논리
포은학연구
2022 .04
-
中韓“无极太极”論辯之比較研硏究
한국학논집
2019 .12
-
英 ․ 正祖 연간 樊巖 蔡濟恭의 생애와 정치 활동
민족문화
2023 .07
-
조선후기 世子 喪禮 의절의 확립과 그 성격
[TCHCCOS] 서울과 역사
2016 .06
-
병자호란 전야 외교 접촉의 실상과 청의 기만 작전, 그리고 『청태종실록』의 기록 조작
동양사학연구
2020 .03
-
조선 초기 태종의 호학과 세자 교육
율곡학연구
2017 .12
-
西周 금문에 보이는 ‘周公’ 사적
중국고중세사연구
2022 .08
-
‘승계계획’의 측면에서 본 조선시대 세자에 대한 연구
한국학논집
2020 .03
-
栗谷의 太極論 硏究
율곡학연구
2018 .01
-
신라 상고기 ‘태자’의 성격과 등장 배경
사림
2024 .04
-
사도세자의 죽음을 둘러싼 논란
동아문화
2020 .12
-
한국 뉴미디어 ‘판다’ 관련 담화에 대한 긍정적 담화분석
중국조선어문
2024 .09
-
淸初 만주 흥기 속의 잉굴다이
인문과학연구
2022 .06
-
영조대 후반 왕실여성들의 정치적 행보와 역할
영남학
2024 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0